Over at TPM, a longtime reader and former Republican Hill staffer takes the pulse of Obama and our current Congress and concludes that

This isn’t an argument about the merits of policy. It’s all politics. Ask yourself, is it easier to pass a difficult, complex legislative agenda when the country is under stress if the opposition party is seen as the Party of Bush, or if the opposition party is able to begin redefining itself as the party of populism, or of un-Washingtonism, or of fiscal restraint? Give the opposition party a fresh start, for free, and you’ve bought yourself all manner of trouble. That’s really the only transformative development Obama has presided over so far. (emphasis mine)

This is exactly why many of my Republican friends call themselves “conservative” instead of Republicans. This is why Michael Steele bumbles around begging the base to “come back” to the party fold. This is why Sarah Palin continues to be popular in spite of all her flaws. This is why Massachussetts voted Brown into office. This is why 2009 was the Summer of the Teabaggers.

Once the taint of eight years of Republican rule presided over by possibly the worst president in history is removed from the political petri dish as well as the American people’s collective memories, the culture of populism grows fast and furious into the strain of “conservative” that exists today. Not a new GOP, but something else entirely. Something that reflexively says “no” to everything proposed by the Democrats, no matter how reasonable or “bipartisan”.

We cannot live like this forever.